The FaceBook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/560297341529556
The MeWe Group: https://mewe.com/group/651d613e1dc2e1603b061f92
James said FaceBook hassles him, so he’s possibly moving to MeWe.
James Sloane
My response to a question of what I recommend for cancer.
I have been researching cancer and cancer cures, of which there are many proven cures, for 45 years.
I have yet to find anything as safe and effective as ozone therapy, which addresses cancer through a variety of mechanisms. This includes selectively killing cancer cells through a peroxide overload, without harming healthy tissue. See:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/560297341529556/permalink/724460875113201
There are also a number of herbs that are very effective for cancer.
I prefer formulas that address the cancer from different angles. Such as destroying cancer pathogens, inhibiting angiogenesis, inhibiting mitosis, blocking the Cori cycle and metastases, stripping cholesterol from cancer cell membranes with sterols, antagonizing or reducing hormones that promote growth, reducing inflammation, reducing fuel sources such as ketones and lactate, an increasing anticancer cytokines and superoxide dismutase.
This makes it harder for the cancer cells to build a tolerance to the herbs.
Some of my favorite anticancer herbs I use in formulas are jiaogulan, chaparral, red clover, bladderwrack, andrographis, nettle leaf, pau d' arco, amla, myrrh, and small doses of poke root. I also really like rooibos tea (red tea, honey bush) as it has a superoxide dismutase-like compound that is anticancer, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and immune stimulating.
The herbs are best taken 3-4 times daily on an empty stomach at least 30 minutes before meals.
James Sloane - Science Based Natural Healing
My write up on ozone therapy for cancer:
The Chemistry of Ozone Therapy on Cancer
Ozone therapy is the safest and most effective cancer therapy I have ever found.
An interesting aspect of ozone therapy is that ozone has the ability to selectively destroy cancer cells without damaging healthy tissue.
See: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7403859
Science. 1980 Aug 22;209(4459):931-3.
Ozone selectively inhibits growth of human cancer cells.
Sweet F, Kao MS, Lee SC, Hagar WL, Sweet WE.
Abstract
The growth of human cancer cells from lung, breast, and uterine tumors was selectively inhibited in a dose-dependent manner by ozone at 0.3 to 0.8 part per million of ozone in ambient air during 8 days of culture. Human lung diploid fibroblasts served as noncancerous control cells. The presence of ozone at 0.3 to 0.5 part per million inhibited cancer cell growth 40 and 60 percent, respectively. The noncancerous lung cells were unaffected at these levels. Exposure to ozone at 0.8 part per million inhibited cancer cell growth more than 90 percent and control cell growth less than 50 percent. Evidently, the mechanisms for defense against ozone damage are impaired in human cancer cells.
Another interesting aspect of ozone when dealing with cancer is that the ozone fights cancer through a variety of mechanisms. Some of the anticancer effects of ozone include:
-Destruction of cancer producing pathogens.
-Oxidative destruction of xenoestrogens and other carcinogens.
-Increasing levels of immune stimulating and cancer fighting cytokines.
-Increasing levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD). SOD converts the superoxide anion in to oxygen, and anti-cancer and immune stimulating hydrogen peroxide.
-Increasing white blood cell activity.
-Decreasing lactate levels preventing its conversion back in to glucose through gluconeogenesis.
-Immediate and direct destruction of cancer cells through an overload of peroxide within the cancerous cells.
Advantages of ozone over allopathic treatments include:
-Cancerous cells cannot build up a tolerance to ozone the way it can to chemotherapy or radiation therapy. This is especially useful for destroying metastasized cells that can migrate in to the brain or bone where they are hard to treat with allopathic methods.
-Ozone therapy is not inhibited by a poor vasculature within tumors as is the case with chemotherapy and radiation therapy, which is why most of these therapies have such low success rates. Studies have shown that the combination of ozone therapy with chemotherapy increases the effectiveness of the chemotherapy drugs by increasing oxygen levels and thus oxygen radicals within the hypoxic regions of tumors. The same would apply to ozone being used in conjunction with radiation therapy since radiation therapy is also limited in success due to a lack of oxygen radical formation within the hypoxic regions of the tumor.
-Ozone therapy does not cause metastases of cancer cells like biopsies and radiation therapy can.
-Ozone therapy is not carcinogenic (cancer causing) or immune suppressing like radiation therapy and chemotherapy.
-Ozone stimulates the healing of damaged tissues in low concentrations.
-Ozone treatments can be self administered at home.
-Ozone therapy is cost efficient. Cold corona units needed for therapy can be purchased for between $500-1500, with an additional $200 for an oxygen tank and regulator. The cost of oxygen and electricity averages less than $0.10 per treatment.
-Properly administered ozone therapy has an extremely high safety rate. In one study conducted in Germany following the application of over 6.5 million doses of ozone given there were slightly over 30 adverse reactions. Most of these due to improper administration and were often mild such as minor irritation at the injection site.
-Ozone therapy increases the levels of antioxidant enzymes so that oxidative damage to healthy cells is minimal to non-existent when ozone is used properly.
To understand how ozone selectively destroys cancer cells we first need to go over some basic chemistry. Ozone is generally accepted as being O3, although higher allotropes (O4 and up) do exist. If I write up the formula this way O:O·O we can see that two of the oxygen atoms are stable due to paired electrons, but the third oxygen atom is not. This makes the ozone molecule itself unstable and reactive. As the ozone molecule is broken down singlet oxygen (O1 or O·) is formed. Singlet oxygen is one of the strongest oxidizers known, with only fluorine exceeding it in oxidation power.
The oxygen we breath, O2, is stable because it has paired balancing electrons (O:O). Singlet oxygen (O·) on the other hand does not have a paired electron to stabilize it. This makes the singlet oxygen highly reactive since it is needs to seek out an electron it can steal to stabilize itself. For example, as ozone breaks down the singlet oxygen atoms released can react with each other to form a more stable O2.
Other sources for singlet oxygen to obtain electrons from to stabilize can include carcinogens, cancer microbes, water and lipids (fats). It is this reactivity that allows ozone to have so many anticancer properties.
These anticancer properties include:
-Killing cancer pathogens by either reacting with the lipids in the membranes of the pathogen creating lipid peroxides destroying the pathogen directly, or by reacting with water to form hydrogen peroxide that in turn destroys the pathogen.
-Destruction of carcinogens, such as xenoestrogens through oxidative destruction by ozone.
-Peroxides formed by ozone increase production of immune supporting cytokines.
-Peroxides created by the reaction of ozone on water lead to cellular apoptosis (self destruction) of low adenosine triphosphate (ATP) containing cells such as aged cells and cancerous tumor cells.
-Both lipid peroxides and hydrogen peroxide created during ozone therapy increase white blood activity, which are a primary component of the immune system.
-The formation of lipid and hydrogen peroxides lead to the selective destruction of cancerous tumor cells through an overload of peroxide within the cells.
Before I go any further though, I also need to point out a key difference between cancerous tumor cells and healthy cells. This will help further explain how ozone selectively kills cancer cells.
Peroxides are generated by our own cells because peroxide is required for a number of functions within the body. These functions include destruction of pathogens, activation of white blood cells, stimulating production of immune enhancing cytokines and destruction of cancerous cells by natural killer (NK) cells.
Peroxide can also damage cells. Therefore, healthy cells contain antioxidant enzymes known as catalase (CAT) and other peroxidases, such as the glutathione peroxidases. These enzymes break down peroxides protecting healthy cells from oxidative damage by these peroxides.
Cancer cells contain significantly lower levels of these antioxidant enzymes. Therefore, cancer cells are not able to deal with an influx of peroxide. Since the peroxides entering the cancer cells are not being enzymatically broken down in to harmless water and oxygen the influx of peroxide in to the cancer cells cause the cancer cells to swell and burst.
This is the same mechanism by which cancer cells are destroyed by the immune system when they can be detected by the immune system. Cancerous cells are often hard for the immune system to detect since they can “shield” themselves from the immune system to avoid detection. When the immune system does detect cancerous tumor cells NK cells attach to the detected cancer cells. Once attached the NK cells inject peroxide in to the cancer cells causing the cancer cells to swell and burst. This is an Achilles’ heel for cancerous cells. Because cancerous cells are deficient in antioxidant enzymes they cannot break down peroxides efficiently like healthy cells. Therefore, peroxide entering the cancer cells will swell cancer cells to the point of rupturing.
Ozone has a very similar effect on cancer cells as NK cells. When ozone reacts with the lipids (fats) of cancer cell membranes lipid peroxides are formed. Singlet oxygen formed from the breakdown of ozone will also form some hydrogen peroxide by reaction with extracellular water. These peroxides enter cancer cells causing the cancer cells to swell until they burst. During the process more singlet oxygen is generated, which in turn creates more peroxides leading to a chain reaction. Therefore, very small amounts of ozone are capable of destroying extensive amounts of cancer cells upon contact.
Healthy cells are not damaged since they contain sufficient levels of antioxidant enzymes to deal with the influx of peroxides. Ozone therapy further increases levels of these antioxidant enzymes in healthy cells.
One study performed in Germany found that when ozone was injected in to mammary carcinomas of mice that the tumors were completely destroyed within 5 minutes of injection. There was no damage to surrounding healthy tissue.
Ozone therapy must be properly administrated with the proper dosage for the therapy to be safe and effective. Therefore, ozone therapy should not be applied without proper knowledge and training.
James Sloane
Cancer is not caused by eating meat, it is not caused by acidity, nor general mutations, heredity or lack of oxygen as are so often claimed.
Cancer is the result of genetic mutations. The most common reason for the genetic mutations that lead to cancer are viral infections:
http://curezone.info/forums/fm.asp?i=1715317#i
http://curezone.info/forums/fm.asp?i=1556071#i
http://curezone.info/forums/fm.asp?i=1556072#i
http://curezone.info/forums/fm.asp?i=1556077#i
For example, skin cancer is often blamed on sunlight. It is not sunlight that causes cancer though. It is an infection of human papilloma virus in the skin that causes the cancer. The sunlight is simply the activator for this virus.
Viral infections have been linked to numerous cancers including leukemias, lymphomas, brain, skin, breast, vulvar, endometrial, cervical, prostate, penile, liver, nasopharyngeal, oropharynx, colon, etc.
If we really think about it how can random mutations cause so many of the same exact cancers when there are millions of different possible mutations? Viral infections in the other hand cause the same exact mutations leading to cancer through various mechanisms including inhibiting apoptosis, activating growth hormone genes, etc.
Cancer viruses have actually been known since the early 1900s, but the medical establishment rarely speaks of these instead trying to convince people of bogus claims such as they are random mutations or hereditary. Again random mutations would not cause such widespread cancers as pointed out and in addition most mutated cells are readily identified and destroyed by the immune system. Not the same for cancer cells, which are very good at evading immune detection.
James Sloane
Here is another old comment and my response to it:
ThomasTSC: "Somewhere there is a cure for cancer."
There have been all sorts of cures for cancer for a very long time. Ozone therapy for example is the safest and most effective cancer cure ever devised and it has been around since 1892. Groups like the American Cancer Society and Susan G, Komen don't really want cures because a cure would mean they no longer exist. Same for the government among others because of the amount of revenue cancer generates.
For example the Susan G Komen society is supposedly looking for a cure for breast cancer. Ozone cures it quickly, effectively and selectively. There is also podophyllumtoxin that was reported in the Journal of the American Medical Association and the Journal of the American Cancer Society back in the 50s to highly effective against 6 forms of cancer including breast cancer. But this was a naturally occurring compound being derived from mandrake and so was not something the drug companies could really control so it was shelved for over 50 years while more people died from these curable cancers. Then University of North Carolina found a way to synthesize the podophyllumtoxin and got a patent on it. They sold it to a California drug company somewhere around 15 years ago and that was the last we heard of it. If the Susan G Komen association really wanted a cure for breast cancer then why are they not pushing for either of these proven cures? All these groups care about is big salaries for their executives, free travel, big parties, etc. all paid for by people who got sucked in giving donations to supposedly find a cure when they already exist.
As another example I used to post on the American Leukemia and Lymphoma Society message board. That was until I was banned for providing proof that these cancers were viral induced. One of their other posters was being sarcastic telling me to tell his doctor that since his doctor had never heard of leukemia or lymphoma viruses. So I told him he needs to find a new doctor since leukemia and lymphoma viruses, such as HIV (human T-cell leukemia/lymphoma virus type 3), have been well known for about 25 years. Then I proceeded to post numerous medical journal abstracts about the various known human leukemia and lymphoma causing viruses. I was immediately banned from the message board and all of my posts were erased while all the posts calling me a quack, which were in clear violation of their posting rules were left up. The problem is that if they admitted that leukemias and lymphomas were primarily viral in origin then they would also have to admit the cures already exist since we have numerous pharmaceutical and herbal antivirals that are highly effective in treating leukemias and lymphomas and thus there is NO reason for the American Leukemia and Lymphoma Society to exist. Therefore, they had to get rid of me and my posts before people started to catch on to what a major scam they had going.
In fact, the ONLY pharmaceutical chemotherapy drugs that have shown any type of significant success in the treatment of cancers are the drugs Vincristine and Vinblastine. Both of these drugs are derived from the herb Madagascar periwinkle and these drugs have an 80% success rate in treating leukemias and lymphomas. The reason these drugs are so effective against leukemias and lymphomas is because these drugs are powerful antiviral drugs.
Same with herbal treatments for leukemias and lymphomas. The herbs pau d' arco (lapacho, taheebo, ipe roxo) and andrographis to name a few are EXTREMELY effective in treating both leukemias and lymphomas due to their powerful antiviral properties.
James Sloane
The following is a debate I have been having with a guy on a YouTube video:
"dnj You can't show anything because alternative therapies have no scientific evidence that they work. All conventional cancer treatments have to go through rigorous testing by law in order to prove that they work. You can find the cancer curing stat for just about any conventional treatment; the claims for alternative treatments are either anecdotal or fraudulent, and don't survive the scrutiny. That is what researching will tell you."
My response:
… What a load of crap. There was an article in JAMA decades ago where it was reported that the drug companies testing chemo drugs were dropping people from studies that died or did not respond from the final results to make the drugs appear effective. A practice that still goes on to this day. NOVA did a documentary on a new angiogenesis inhibitor being tested and gave a great example as one of the test subjects was dropped from the study because his "tumor grew beyond the parameters of the study". What that means is that the drug failed so they dropped the guy so the test results would not be skewed in to the negative. I believe this drug in on the market now as Endostatin. On the other had there is tons of research in the medical journals on PubMed proving the efficacy of various holistic therapies for cancer. And unlike the chemo drugs there is not billions of dollars at stake so there is no reason to manipulate the test results like big pharma does with chemo testing.