The FaceBook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/560297341529556
The MeWe Group: https://mewe.com/group/651d613e1dc2e1603b061f92
James Sloane - Alternative Therapies
The following is a debate I have been having with a guy on a YouTube video:
"dnj You can't show anything because alternative therapies have no scientific evidence that they work. All conventional cancer treatments have to go through rigorous testing by law in order to prove that they work. You can find the cancer curing stat for just about any conventional treatment; the claims for alternative treatments are either anecdotal or fraudulent, and don't survive the scrutiny. That is what researching will tell you."
My response:
What a load of crap. There was an article in JAMA decades ago where it was reported that the drug companies testing chemo drugs were dropping people from studies that died or did not respond from the final results to make the drugs appear effective. A practice that still goes on to this day. NOVA did a documentary on a new angiogenesis inhibitor being tested and gave a great example as one of the test subjects was dropped from the study because his "tumor grew beyond the parameters of the study". What that means is that the drug failed so they dropped the guy so the test results would not be skewed in to the negative. I believe this drug in on the market now as Endostatin. On the other had there is tons of research in the medical journals on PubMed proving the efficacy of various holistic therapies for cancer. And unlike the chemo drugs there is not billions of dollars at stake so their is no reason to manipulate the test results like big pharma does with chemo testing.
James Sloane - Covid Scam
Someone recently posted a link to a site called “Science Based Medicine”, which I addressed as the site appears to be run by doctors that do not seem to know very much about science or medicine or how to do proper research. They simply look for studies that bash holistic therapies and studies that support allopathic ideas.
For example, they claim masks help prevent the spread of covid even though science has proven the opposite. For instance, it has been long known that a major route of virus transmission is though the eyes, which masks do nothing to protect. It has also been proven that even the N95 masks do not stop the virus. N95 masks were designed to stop the tuberculosis bacterium, which is over 1,000 times larger than the covid virus. The virus can easily pass through an N95 mask and even easier through paper or cloth masks, Science has also shown that coughing or sneezing through masks actually breaks up the ejecta helping to aerosolize the virus so it can travel much longer distances. To understand this easier, it is like the aerator on your water faucet. Take the aerator off and the water comes out in large blobs just like when we cough or sneeze without a mask. Force that water through an aerator and the water globs get broken up in to much smaller particles just like the ejecta being forced through a fine mask when we cough or sneeze.
I ran across another claim of theirs claiming that three studies have shown the covid vaccines have been shown “very safe” for children. Although I find it interesting that multiple studies have not only shown that the covid shots can induce myocarditis, but also that suddenly at the start of the covid shots there was a sudden surge in the number of cases of myocarditis in newborns. They are trying to blame the rise on enteroviruses, but common sense questions this claim as these enteroviruses existed long before this major surge in cases, and the surge started at the same time as the covid shots, that are well known for inducing myocarditis among other side effects were introduced.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9419896/
https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1004245
https://academic.oup.com/.../eurheartj/ehad339/7188747...
Wonder why if these doctors were really about science that they did not discuss this study that contradicts their claim?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9802621/
And these:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8356143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8367318/
What I find really interesting in this study is where they say “CDC and FDA will continue to monitor for adverse events, including myocarditis, after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination and share available data with ACIP to guide risk-benefit assessments for all COVID-19 vaccines”. What this means is that they are using people, including children, as experimental guinea pigs to test whether these covid shots are safe instead of testing the safety before approval. A common thing even with many other pharmaceutical drugs that get FDA approval without full safety and efficacy studies all for the sake of profits.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9023259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9233237/
Also keep in mind that the government clearly stated at one point that children could not get or spread covid. So why are they trying to force these covid shot that can cause all sort of problems including heart damage, neurological damage, hormone imbalances, blood clots, thrombocytopenia, etc. on children they claim could not get or spread covid? And how does this make the covid shots “very safe” for children as the doctors from the Science Based Medicine site claim? If these anti-science doctors consider these dangerous side effects as “very safe”, then what do they consider dangerous side effects? Only death, which is also a side effect of the covid shots?
What I would really like to see studies on that I cannot find are how many of these children being born with myocarditis, the mother’s had received the covid shots while pregnant. Again, despite enteroviruses being around long before 2020 and that still exist to this day, there was a massive spike in cases of myocarditis that coincides with the introduction of the covid shots up until recently as the number of covid shots being given has dropped dramatically. If this spike was really do to enteroviruses then why was there no spike prior to the covid shot introduction, and why did the number of cases suddenly drop with the drop in covid shots being given?
And why are they still trying to illegally coerce or otherwise convince people to take these dangerous covid shots that have been shown to not prevent covid infection or reduce symptomology better than natural immunity for a virus significantly less deadly than the flu that lockdowns, masks, social distancing or shots were not forced upon people? Also keep in mind that when these covid shots came out they were having logistical problems with dispersion since these covid shots had to be stored in special sub-zero freezers up to time of use. These freezers though were in very short supply and expensive, and thus virtually the covid shot distribution centers DID NOT have these special freezers and thus these covid shots WERE NOT being stored as required before administration.
Governments were just making crap up as they went to fit their needs and violating the law and people’s rights to illegally force these covid shots on people as well as force control over the population. I see no evidence that any of this had anything to do with public safety as actual medical studies kept contradicting all the claims being made by the government.
Back to the Science Based Medicine site, again we can see that this site has no credibility. It is just a pro-alloapathic medical propaganda site that ignores actual science to promote their agenda.